6.4
Justified himself not
by assertion only,
but
by Evidence - You state
that
the Chief Justice
had not satisfied you
by the manner
which he accepted
in
your proposal of reference :
but the papers before
me do not
fully enable me
to understand part of your
this statement - Be
this
as it
may.
however
W. Austin had on
18
his side refused to
apologize, and accompany
his refusal with language
Calculated
to
give
great additional offence Still, as I before said,
whatever opinion might
be formed of the conduct
of the parties, nothing had happened absolutely
requiring
the intervention
of Authority
5 But in
your
letter
of the 25 May you
23
6.4
Justified himself not
by assertion only,
but
by Evidence - You state
that
the Ch Lustice
had not satisfied you
by the manne
which be accepted.
in
your proposal of reference :
but the papers before
me do
fully
not enable me
to understand
hart of our
this statement - Be
^
this
as it
may.
however
W. Ausley had on
18
his side refused to
apologize, and accompany
his refural with language
Calculated
to
give
great additional offence Still, as I before said,
whatever opinion might
be formed of the conduct
of the parties, nolling had happened absolutely
requiring
the intervention
of Authority
5 But in
your
letter
of the 25. May you
23
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.